Judge James S Parker of Arcadia, FL Has No Problem Taking Children From Illegal Immigrant

Judge James S Parker of Arcadia FL

Judge James S Parker of  DeSoto County, FL has no problems with taking children from an illegal immigrant mother that has developed mental disease.  The Judge has wrecked the lives of the mother and her children — stealing her children from her when her mental state is diminished, convening hearings that decide the fate of her family’s future when neither she nor her legal representative is present to fight for her rights. The Judge, with the help of crooked DCF lawyer Robin Jensen, placed these children with a family of American strangers, in lieu of their aunt or man and women they consider their father and mother — two families they know, have developed relationships and who are more than willing and able to provide them with a secure, safe, comfortable, and loving environment. The same people who have provided for Dulce since birth (the other child Leslie having been taken from the mother immediately after her birth in the hospital by DCF), ensuring that Dulce’s physical, social/emotional, and medical needs have been provided for.  Ensuring that she has had every opportunity to see and spend quality time with their mother on her good days, and that she has connections to her family.

Judge James S Parker makes many bad decisions and someone has to help correct his errors — they are wrecking lives.

http://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/non-biological-father-parental-rights.html

There are cases where it is reasonable or even in the best interest of the child, for the child to be placed with their non biological father.  Read more about the legal standard for this.  This is what I learned.

When Can a Man Who is Not the Biological or Adoptive Father of a Child Have Parental Rights?
There is a strong presumption that a child’s welfare is best served by being in the custody of a natural parent. As a result, non-parents have an uphill battle, and a number of cases end with natural parents winning custody. However, as a matter of public policy, a man who is the non-parental father of a child who has developed emotional parental feelings toward a child may be able to assert the rights as a biological or adoptive parent
How Often Can a Non-Parent Adult Win Child Custody?
An adult who wants custody of a child but is not their birth parent faces an uphill battle. Courts rarely grant non-parents these rights because it is believed that the birth parents provide the best guidance and most attachments to the children. It is only possible for a non-parent adult to win custody of a child if they can show that they are:
psychologically the child’s guardian, or
the biological parent(s) are unfit to be parents
Both of these hurdles are extremely difficult to clear and even if they are met, the non-parent custody must still be shown to be in the child’s best interests.
What Does the Court Take into Consideration in Granting Parental Rights?
A court’s decision in granting child custody right is always based on the best interests of the child regardless of whether the parties seeking custody are the biological or non-biologocial parents.  Factors the Court considers in making their decision include:
Child’s Age
The child’s age is often an important consideration that courts use in determining parental rights. A very young child may be considered unable to form a meaningful parental relationship while an older child’s interest may best be served to protect a developed successful parent-child relationship.
Mother’s Support
The mother’s support in deciding to grant parental rights to a non-biological or non-adoptive father will have significant weight in court. Public Policy has an inclination to protect a marital union, and so, the court may use its power to grant rights to support a current relationship.
You should be considered innocent until it can be proved that you are guilty. If you are accused of a crime, you should always have the right to defend yourself. Nobody has the right to condemn you and punish you for something you have not done.
The Relationship between Child and Man
The court will take into account the depth of the relationship between the child and the man. It will take into consideration whether the parent-child relationship has become well developed and successful
Judge Parker, if you read this, I want you to know that I was the only father Dulce has know since birth — me, Randy. I have the proof of fraud and false staments by DCF.  I will fight for what is right. I hurt worse and worse every day, it is my mission to find a way to have Dulce and Leslie in my life again .  I will not stop until I find a way and I know that I will continue to uncover more fraudulent and illegal activity by Desoto County DCF and yourself as I work to put my family back together.

Judge James S Parker Arcadia Florida want lessons from a respected judge?

  I have to say that I had become very discouraged by the judicial and political system in the United States. In fact I have to say I was ashamed of my country, a country I had always loved and defended to others.

A friend had to go to court in another state on a simple matter and I went along. I was curious to see how things would go and I was not very hopeful, in fact I was quite skeptical.

We were sitting in the court room and I started to notice something new. This judge was taking the time to read all of the papers set in front of him. I set up and took notice, this was something I had not seen before. I have been to court dozens of times in the last few months and I had never seen Judge Parker taking the time to read the submitted paper work and looking at the evidence before him before ruling.

Okay I thought this might be different. I really started to listen, I heard this judge listen to the cases, time after time I heard him say he wanted evidence not hearsay. Wow I thought I wish this Judge had been listening to my case, not to be able to just sit and hear Robin S Jensen Sarasota go on and on about her accusations and fanciful imaginations would have been wonderful. He refused to listen to hearsay and wanted evidence. Wonder if Judge Parker would be willing to take lessons from a real Judge? I kind of doubt it as he seems to feel he knows everything, in fact he knows it all without even having to hear from both sides and in fact knows more than even our legislation as he decides which laws he wants to follow.

I saw this Judge rule as the law requires, even when he said he did not agree with the law he followed the law. What a crazy idea, Judges that uphold the law and not try to make the laws.

He went above and beyond his ruling, he would take the time to talk to the plaintiffs and defendants, he would try to help them work out their differences and had them leave the court working together instead of enemies. If he made a ruling on a judgment for instance he did not stop there he would try to work out a payment schedule that would work for everyone. Now it did not always work but I can tell you the majority of the people that left that day had justice served, and were not left with the bitter taste in their mouth.

This Judge cared about the law and upheld it and he cared about people and their lives.

I was so excited when we were leaving the court house, I found my pride in my country again, it was not the country, not that there are not problems, but it was the Florida Judicial System,( as anyone watching TV knows). There are honest caring people in this country who swear to uphold the law and they do. They are not lazy and power hungry. They know they are not above the law but protectors of the law.

I have been telling everyone around here of my experience, everyone I tell they immediately know who I am talking about I have heard nothing but praise for this judge. He has a stellar reputation of honesty and caring. Whenever I mention Judge James S Parker’s name I get the same reaction of oh no and I have heard about him, and it is never good. If Judge James Parker was half the judge this judge was – then Florida might be able to hold its head  up.

Judge James S. Parker Ordered That I Was Not Allowed To Talk...

Whistleblower Nancy Jo Grant in Florida, Charged With the Unauthorized Practice of Law, is Found Guilty
My name is Nancy Jo Grant, on March 22, 2006 I blew the whistle on the racketeering, closed door hearings, forced plea deals, bogus trials and the warehousing of inmates in the DeSoto County Courthouse, 12th Judicial Circuit, and DeSoto County Jail in Florida. Three months later, June 29, 2006 I was arrested and a gag order placed on me. Judge James S. Parker ordered that I was not allowed to talk... George C. Leef, President of Patrick Henry Associates in East Lansing, Michigan, says that prohibitions against the unauthorized practice of law (UPL) must end.

Whistleblower Nancy Jo Grant in Florida, Charged With the Unauthorized Practice of Law, is Found Guilty
My name is Nancy Jo Grant, on March 22, 2006 I blew the whistle on the racketeering, closed door hearings, forced plea deals, bogus trials and the warehousing of inmates in the DeSoto County Courthouse, 12th Judicial Circuit, and DeSoto County Jail in Florida. Three months later, June 29, 2006 I was arrested and a gag order placed on me. Judge James S. Parker ordered that I was not allowed to talk... George C. Leef, President of Patrick Henry Associates in East Lansing, Michigan, says that prohibitions against the unauthorized practice of law (UPL) must end.
          

UPDATE:

The Verdict Is In
Jerry-Carlos of the family Pitts, eradicatecorruption.org

Nancy was found guilty on all 19 remaining charges. Not all is so dismal however. The Judge Haworth, unable to look her in the eye after the verdict was delivered, stated that he is withholding adjudication, pending a presentence investigation hearing which will be held on September 26. Nancy indicated that the primary discussion right now is that they are looking at a probation as opposed to prison time.

Praise the Lord. Now Nancy can pursue the federal end. Oh, By the way. Two days ago, she recieved an order from the Federal District Court, wherein the defendants of that case, the judge and the prosecutor now have less than a week to give their response to her complaint.

We are actively looking for the support of any and all, so that this travesty cannot have an ill effect on the entire nation. Imagine the school teachers that will no longer be allowed to teach civic classes... imagine no politicians being able to discuss hot item legal issues as a basis for their campaign... and the list goes on.

more:

Mr Lawhorne:
Your article listed below, is almost a near representation of the TRUTH. I say almost, due to the fact that you did not report all of the facts regarding the case.

As an example: You failed to report to the private sector (sometimes referred to as the Public), the fact that the jury was denied opportunity to hear any defense information by order of Judge Haworth; You also failed to report to the same private sector, the fact that the Judge Haworth, utilized a definition of UPL that has not been approved by the Legislature of the State of Florida (see the US Supreme Court case entitled “Connolly v General Construction. Also do the research on cases that have depended on that decision of the Supreme Court) also see (Clearfield Doctrine another Supreme Court decision wherein the Supreme Court clarifies that the use by governments of commercial instruments makes those governments nothing more than corporations and are thereby bound by commercial laws, rules, and regulations).
You, Mr Lawhorne, also failed to tell the private sector, that during the first three days of the trial, the prosecution witnesses denied the allegations by which Ms Grant was charged. In fact, one of the prosecution witnesses, also pointed out that the prosecutor had in fact committed a violation of law, by entering personal information relative to the jurors into the record of the trial.
You, Mr Lawhorne, also failed to report to the private sector, the fact that the complainant, Susan German Wright, has been listed, by public record, of being in violation of Florida Law for the past 14 years, and that she has never been prosecuted for the criminal violations to which she is guilty by virtue of Public Record. See records available at http://www.jail4judges.org/NL_Library/2007/NL%202007-02-12.html
Do your homework Mr Lawhorne, and quit taking the word of those that profane Justice. I am certain that your editors would prefer that the writers for this News media maintain the integrity of the Sun Herald by printing the TRUTH.
Jerry-Carlos of the family Pitts
All Rights Reserved


08/25/07
Grant guilty on all 19 counts

A DeSoto County jury convicted activist late Friday on charges of practicing law without a license

DESOTO COUNTY -- A six-member jury found civil rights activist Nancy Grant guilty Friday evening on all 19 counts against her of practicing law without a license. Each count is a third-degree felony and is punishable by up to five years in prison.

She remains free on bail pending her sentencing hearing, which is set for Sept. 25.

The 19 counts filed against Grant each involved an inmate incarcerated in the DeSoto County Jail. Grant denied giving legal advice to these inmates. She said the organization she founded, called Florida Pro Se Bar, helps people, especially people who are incarcerated, learn to file legal papers in court for themselves. "Pro Se" is a Latin term meaning "on behalf of oneself." The phrase, Grant said, refers to a person who is not a lawyer, but who chooses to represent himself in court.

Grant said she and Pro Se Bar are not giving legal advice, but just doing typing and performing courier services to move legal papers from the jail to court, and to share information.

During testimony Friday, Grant said she would be suing the Public Defender's Office for racketeering. She said lawyers were paid to represent inmates, but did nothing. "Being paid to represent a client, but not doing anything is racketeering," she told the jury.

Grant, 55, was arrested June 29, 2006, and charged with practicing law without a license. She was released on $50,000 bond shortly thereafter.

The case began when an Arcadia attorney, Susan Germann Wright, filed a complaint against Grant alleging that she (Wright) had learned from a client of hers in the county jail that he had received unsolicited legal forms and a letter misrepresenting the law. Wright said she considered the legal advice promoted in the letter incorrect.

Wright said the letter sent to her client came from a corporation called Florida Pro Se and contained a document called an "emergency motion to dismiss" that stated the client had received the document because he had been incarcerated over 180 days in violation of his due process rights.

The letter, according to Wright, went on to say Florida Pro Se wanted to help the client/inmate by filing legal motions on his behalf.

You can e-mail John Lawhorne at jlawhorne@sun-herald.com.

By JOHN LAWHORNE, Staff Writer

Florida JAILer-In-Chief on Trial for Whistleblowing
Trial Date: August 20, 2007

PRESS RELEASE

http://www.parentadvocates.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=article&articleID=7352

Did Judge James S Parker Threaten A Witness With 150 Years In Prison If He Did Not Take a 10 Year Plea

I post you you decide



PRESS RELEASE
August 30, 2007
Arcadia, Florida

FLORIDA GRANDMOTHER CHARGED CRIMINALLY TO LIFE IN PRISON FOR JAIL MINISTRY


Judge Hayworth addressed the court room and a crowd of more than 30 spectators, requesting order and silence to those that that had traveled far in support of Nancy Grant.

Nancy, a grandmother of four children, ages 4 to 7, will spend the rest of her life in prison, if the federal appeal fails to over rule the guilty verdict of 19 counts of criminal charges, 5 years for each inmate that Nancy assisted, for the "victim-less crime" that she committed, according to her conviction.

On June 29, 2007 Nancy Grant was arrested in Arcadia, Florida. According to Nancy, the State charged her with an obsolete Florida Statute, 454.23, for the Unlicensed Practice of Law. This statute was repealed in 1968 when the Florida Constitution was revised, therefore, Nancy is the first in Florida history to be charged criminally with this violation, she states. Mrs. Grant, adds to have knowledge that this statute has been used on many other occasions to threaten those who challenge the Florida Bar's monopoly or civil rights violations, according to her research.

Mrs. Grant's ministry started when one of her sons was arrested. Nancy learned about numerous inmates, including immigrants, that after years on imprisonment, are still waiting for a hearing, according to Nancy. To Nancy's surprise, letters kept pouring in from other inmates with similar situations. That is when Nancy learned that illegal immigrants were being detained for crimes that many denounced ever committing, she further states.

Nancy's interest in the judicial branch and her fight for justice began earlier in life when due to her own experiences, Nancy ran for state representative in 2000, for governor as a write-in candidate in 2002 and circuit judge in 2004, this gave her experience in all three branches of the government.

After running for county judge, Nancy formed a non-profit corporation called the Florida Pro se Bar, Inc. The organization provided an avenue for prisoners in the state of Florida to access the courts that were being held for years without a hearing or trial and encouraged self representation before the court, according to Nancy.

Shortly after founding her organization, an attorney, Susan Germann Wright filed a complaint against Nancy Grant because two of Mrs. Wrights' clients requested assistance from the Florida Pro se Bar because they had been abandoned by Ms. Wright, according Mrs. Grant. The state attorney's office and sheriff's department both stated in Nancy's trial that if anyone teaches civil rights, as in the Bill of Rights, it is practicing law, a third degree felony carrying a five year prison sentence, as Nancy states was testified in her trial.

Cases like Gregory Tijerina, one of the inmates that Nancy offered religious comfort and information about his due process rights, testified on the witness stand that he was threatened by 12th Circuit Judge, James S. Parker, with 150 years in prison if he did not take a 10 year plea, "right now," she adds. Also according to Nancy, Gregory was cut and beaten for speaking about the illegal aliens detained in the Arcadia county jail.
In the meantime, Nancy Grant stated that she has contacted, Department of Justice, Mark Kappelhoff, Chief of Criminal Civil Rights Division and various members from Congress. In addition, Nancy has communicated with NATO's press department, the International Court of Justice and the Mexican Embassies in the United States, all of which have expressed interest in the case and requested additional information, Nancy adds.

As Nancy Grant awaits her sentencing on September 25, 2007 in the 12th Judicial Circuit of Florida, she states that various national civil rights groups are already offering assistance. We the People of Florida has notified its four thousand plus members, to mobilize into action, not only in her support, but also to denounce the crisis involving countless of "detainees" still awaiting trial after years of imprisonment, according to Nancy.

http://floridajail4judges.org/counties/Desoto_County.html#Grandmother

For more information:

Please contact http://www.wtpifl.com/ or WTOSouthEast@aol.com
We the People of Florida Institute at 352-404-4820
Or visit http://www.nancygrant.info/ at 863-494-0363

Wanted .....Judge James Parker Of Arcadia FL.... brokered a deal to release convicted drug dealers.

                                                           Judge James Parker

NAME:  Judge James Parker, 12th Cuircut Court Judge, Desoto County Florida

POSITION:  12th Cuircut Court Judge, Desoto County Florida for over thirty years.

WANTED FOR: Releasing convicted drug smugglers for money.

Past Crimes:  DUI with a minor under 18 and a 0.15  or higher Blood alcohol level in Florida 4/21/91 and prior convictions.

 Sarasota Herald Tribune 1991 http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=UZ0cAAAAIBAJ&sjid=GGgEAAAAIBAJ&pg=6159,4091895&hl=en

Judge James Parker of Arcadia FL

Judge James Parker of  Arcadia, FL has no problems with taking children from an illegal immigrant mother that has developed mental disease.  The Judge has wrecked the lives of the mother and her children — stealing her children from her when her mental state is diminished, convening hearings that decide the fate of her family’s future when neither she nor her legal representative is present to fight for her rights. The Judge, with the help of crooked DCF lawyer Robin Jensen, placed these children with a family of American strangers, in lieu of their aunt or man and women they consider their father and mother — two families they know, have developed relationships and who are more than willing and able to provide them with a secure, safe, comfortable, and loving environment. The same people who have provided for Dulce since birth (the other child Leslie having been taken from the mother immediately after her birth in the hospital by DCF), ensuring that Dulce’s physical, social/emotional, and medical needs have been provided for.  Ensuring that she has had every opportunity to see and spend quality time with their mother on her good days, and that she has connections to her family.

Judge James Parker makes many bad decisions and someone has to help correct his errors — they are wrecking lives.

http://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/non-biological-father-parental-rights.html

There are cases where it is reasonable or even in the best interest of the child, for the child to be placed with their non biological father.  Read more about the legal standard for this.  This is what I learned.

When Can a Man Who is Not the Biological or Adoptive Father of a Child Have Parental Rights?
There is a strong presumption that a child’s welfare is best served by being in the custody of a natural parent. As a result, non-parents have an uphill battle, and a number of cases end with natural parents winning custody. However, as a matter of public policy, a man who is the non-parental father of a child who has developed emotional parental feelings toward a child may be able to assert the rights as a biological or adoptive parent
How Often Can a Non-Parent Adult Win Child Custody?
An adult who wants custody of a child but is not their birth parent faces an uphill battle. Courts rarely grant non-parents these rights because it is believed that the birth parents provide the best guidance and most attachments to the children. It is only possible for a non-parent adult to win custody of a child if they can show that they are:
psychologically the child’s guardian, or
the biological parent(s) are unfit to be parents
Both of these hurdles are extremely difficult to clear and even if they are met, the non-parent custody must still be shown to be in the child’s best interests.
What Does the Court Take into Consideration in Granting Parental Rights?
A court’s decision in granting child custody right is always based on the best interests of the child regardless of whether the parties seeking custody are the biological or non-biologocial parents.  Factors the Court considers in making their decision include:
Child’s Age
The child’s age is often an important consideration that courts use in determining parental rights. A very young child may be considered unable to form a meaningful parental relationship while an older child’s interest may best be served to protect a developed successful parent-child relationship.
Mother’s Support
The mother’s support in deciding to grant parental rights to a non-biological or non-adoptive father will have significant weight in court. Public Policy has an inclination to protect a marital union, and so, the court may use its power to grant rights to support a current relationship.
You should be considered innocent until it can be proved that you are guilty. If you are accused of a crime, you should always have the right to defend yourself. Nobody has the right to condemn you and punish you for something you have not done.
The Relationship between Child and Man
The court will take into account the depth of the relationship between the child and the man. It will take into consideration whether the parent-child relationship has become well developed and successful
Judge Parker, if you read this, I want you to know that I was the only father Dulce has know since birth — me, Randy. I have the proof of fraud and false staments by DCF.  I will fight for what is right. I hurt worse and worse every day, it is my mission to find a way to have Dulce and Leslie in my life again .  I will not stop until I find a way and I know that I will continue to uncover more fraudulent and illegal activity by Desoto County DCF and yourself as I work to put my family back together.
“The world is a dangerous place to live,
not because of the people who are evil,
but because of the people who don’t do
anything about it”.
-Albert Einstein
Help us do something about evil and crooked Robin Jensen and Judge James Parker.